AUTHORITARIAN GOVERNMENT V. THE RULE OF LAW. Lectures
and Essays (1999-2014) on the Venezuelan Authoritarian Regime established in contempt
of the Constitution
This book is a collection of all the Essays of
Professor Allan R. Brewer-Carías on the Venezuelan Authoritarian Government and
the Demolition of the Rule of Law, written during the past fourteen years
(1999-2014), in which he has analyzed not only the most important aspects of
Venezuelan constitutional law provisions according to the 1999 Constitution,
but also how the authoritarian government installed in the country since its
enactment, has ruled it against the rule of the Constitution, subverting the
democratic regime from within by using its own institutions and tools. The
process began with the convening of a Constituent Assembly in 1999 against the
provisions of the then in force 1961 Constitution, seeking to supposedly impose
people's sovereignty over the principle of constitutional supremacy. What
resulted was the intervention and takeover of all branches of government, being
the Constituent Assembly the main tool used for assaulting the State's powers,
imposing in the country an authoritarian, centralistic and militaristic
government, eliminating, any sort of check and balance framework, subjecting
the Judiciary to strict political control, and consequently, dismantling the
rule of law. In addition, the Constituent Assembly assured that the main
provisions of the new Constitution, particularly on the decentralized form of
government, the principle of separation of powers, the independence of the
judiciary and the representative democratic government, were to be suspended in
their effective enforcement due to an endless transitional constitutional
regime it imposed. It was the same "formula" of convening Constituent
Assemblies departing from the Constitution then in force, that a few years
later was also applied in Ecuador (2007), and ten years later was tried to be
imposed in Honduras (2009), in a failed presidential attempt that in that case
the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional. The idea, in any case, continues
to be a recurrent one that in many countries has been proposed. The consequence
of that process in Venezuela has been that since the election of the late
President Hugo Chávez Frías in December 1998, whose only electoral program and
proposal was to convene a Constituent Assembly, the country, formerly envied because
of its democratic tradition and accomplishment during the second half of the
20th century, suffered a tragic setback regarding democratic standards,
experiencing a continuous, persistent and deliberated institution demolishing
process and destruction of democracy, never before occurred in the
constitutional history of the country. At his death, and after fourteen years
in power, the main political legacy of Chávez was no other than a country
lacking the most essential elements of democracy as they are defined in the
Inter American Democratic Charter, namely the assurance of the access to power
and its exercise subject to the rule of law; the performing of periodic, free
and fair elections based on universal and secret vote as an expression of the
sovereignty of the people; the plural regime of political parties and
organizations; the separation and independence of all branches of government,
and the respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. All this process is
analyzed in this book, for which purpose the original text of the thirty Essays
it contains, written and many of them published in different moments and
occasions during the past years, has been preserved, so despite the repetition
of some ideas and references, they remain as a testimony of the ideas expressed
at the time when they were written, and on the course of the different events
that led to the complete destruction of the constitutional rule and of the
democratic principle in the country.
|